Sex Imagery, Censorship
and the Law
Does Pornography Alter Attitudes?
Is this bad?
Yes, it is in the minds of those who feel that much of this type of behavior is inappropriate or sinful.
At the same time, this desensitizing factor has been successfully used to treat individuals who have problems with sex and sexual guilt.
It is this "acceptance factor" that troubles many people who feel that these attitudes are not acceptable and should not be given any type of social approval.
Finally, some individuals contend that exposure to materials with strong prurient appeal makes it more difficult for individuals to respond to normal sexual stimuli. Although this effect is difficult to quantify, anecdotal evidence would seem to support this, at least for limited periods of time. This issue is taken up later in this article.
Many of the studies on pornography were done before the Internet. Clearly, the Internet has opened the door to far greater accessibility. But as we've seen, this has been accompanied be a decline in rape and sexual crime.
A recent survey showed that there are an estimated 300-million pages of porn on the Internet. (Although the chart on the left is obviously dated, it shows how rapidly the viewing of Internet porn increased in just two years.)
Many observers feel that Internet porn has had a negative effect on relationships.
At the 2003 meeting of the Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers the majority of the lawyers said that Internet porn had played a significant role in divorce. "Sexting" and carrying on "relationships" via social networks have also reportedly been a factor in divorce.
However, according to a 2002 survey of more than 7,000 adults, two-thirds of the respondents who say they regularly visit porn sites report it has not affected their relationships.
It appears that people who have grown up with distorted or repressed sexual views, which, includes a significant, but decreasing segment of the U.S. population, have the most problems with, and objections to, pornography.
Individuals who have a positive self-concept, who had parents who were not reluctant to discuss sexual issues, and who were not subjected to negative religious views about human sexuality seldom report problems. This group is also most apt to become disinterested in pornography over time.
Is Pornography Addictive?
Yes, it can be.
According to CBS News, at any one time almost 30,000 people are viewing pornography on the Internet. Of the total number that see pornography, four-million people say they are addicted.
The sexual stimulation from viewing pornography releases dopamine, which creates a kind of dopamine "high" that can be addictive.
But many things can release dopamine in the body: gambling, shopping, overeating, computer games, heroin, etc. They all work differently on the brain, but each can increase the dopamine level.
One of the centerpieces of the crusade against pornography is the "snuff film," or a sex film in which someone supposedly gets murdered.
The problem is that the FBI has spent 30 years and hundreds of thousands dollars trying to find one snuff film in the United States and has reportedly never been able to locate one.
A film entitled Snuff was released in 1976. It was widely promoted as containing a snuff scene, which (just as planned by the promoters) set off a firestorm of opposition and publicity. The film opened in Indianapolis to an audience of 12 people, almost half of which were law enforcement people trying to collect evidence to arrest the people involved.
What they discovered was a poorly faked death scene, which had simply been tacked onto an older film. The scene was far less convincing or graphic than the scenes we often see on prime-time television.
But even after the film was exposed as a fake, numerous anti-porn groups were quickly organized, based on linking pornography with murder. Even the Meese commission, which we discussed earlier, grew out of the protest.
The "Porn Made Me Do It" Defense
The latest anti-porn legal effort has been to connect exposure to sexual material to sex crimes.
Despite research evidence to the contrary, the attempt is to hold anyone with any responsibility for the sex materials liable for damages. "It's the porn made me do it defense which is totally inappropriate," according to Jonathan Cummings of the ACLU's Arts Censorship Project. "There is just no evidence to back it up."
Even so, due in part to a surprising alliance between some feminists and ultraconservatives, we are now seeing legal efforts to blame the media for sexual crime. This ignores the fact that for thousands of years before the invention of the printing press, movies or TV, rape, child abuse, and prostitution flourished.
It has only been relatively recently, thanks to the media,
that rape has started getting the attention it deserves. In earlier
days according to one historian, "Rape was unreportable because
it was unremarkable."
Pornography and "Undesirable Types"
The commercial pornography market is, for the most part, associated with less than respectable business types. This is not surprising, given the fact that social attitudes have pushed many consenting adult sexual activities into the margins of society and defined them as "illegal."
At the same time, as documented in a 60-Minutes
investigation, some prestigious, mainstream U.S. corporations derive
a substantial percent of their income from marketing soft-core and hard-core
pornography -- although the fact is generally disguised in profit reports.
David Finkelhor, a criminologist at the University of New Hampshire has studied Internet-related crime. He reports, "There are new perils for kids, but no evidence that kids are on the whole more endangered today as a result of the Internet."
A report was released In 2009 that showed that more young people were being harmed by peer cyberbullying than by online sexual predators.
Some people feel that the fact that we are seeing a regular stream of TV reports on the danger of sexual predators on the Internet -- far exceeding what the crime would warrant -- may be influenced by a need to to cash in on the salacious, and attention-getting nature of these crimes.
According to a 2004 study by Wolak and Finkelhor, financed by the U.S. Department of Justice, there are a number of fallacies about sexual abusers.
Internet Sex Crimes by Age
An Opposing View: Cal Masterson
On Sex and Pornography
According to Cal Masterson, the author of writings on spiritual sex, despite the fact that research may not support this view, pornography is harmful.
According to Masterson, pornography and cybersex need not be considered Judeo-Christian religious issues, which, historically, have ranged all the way from accepting prostitution to discouraging normal sex between a husband and wife.
All moral issues aside, Masterson says pornography is harmful because the type of idealistic and unrealistic men and women that are shown in pornography become the fantasized, cerebral norm, which then to varying degrees can replace reality.
Even for people in a normal relationship disillusionment with a partner can develop, especially if partners have trouble with open, honest, guilt-free, discussions about sex.
The Allogynia Issue
Masterson also cites allogynia, where sexual arousal and orgasm become dependent on fantasizing about a sexual partner more desirable than one's own.
At the same time, Masterson admits that sexual fantasies appear to be universal.
Finally, Masterson says that often divorce results after people meet an Internet partner whom they feel is more suitable. This generally starts with the uninhibited sexual conversations that are not possible with a spouse or partner.
Believing Makes It So
Hidden within most of the attacks against pornography are unproven assumptions.
In most societies pornography is viewed as harmful -- even without the need for proof. To a great extent these views shape reality.
For example, if pornography is seen as being degrading to women (and generally not to men, which is obviously a dual standard), then to a great extent believing that makes it so.
As pornography becomes even more accepted, and we seem to be headed in that direction, its harmful effects will diminish.
Although moralists will continue to oppose this eventuality,
just as they have initially opposed many social changes throughout history,
acceptance may lessen the negative impact of such things as revenge
porn. For an explanation see Sexting and a Preacher.
The Dark Side of Pornography
Because acting in pornography promises immediate financial reward and requires little professional preparation, it attracts many young women -- primarily women -- who aspire to quickly jump into the limelight. This includes the tens-of-thousands of "cam girls" who populate the Internet.
Few women who aspire to be famous make it beyond an initial debut video, in part because the business needs -- and is easily able to attract -- a constant supply of fresh actors.
This opens the door to exploitation and without a doubt
many who go into the business are exploited in various ways.
The "Evil" Rationale
Throughout history sex has been linked with evil.
Since this is a popular notion, at the risk of moving out of the realm of objective research, we feel this should be briefly addressed.
All strong human motives, money, power, sex, fame and even religion have all been linked with "evil."
Those who assume that this list should not include religion need to be reminded that some of the most horrendous acts throughout history -- the Crusades, the Inquisition, the burning of "witches," etc." -- have all sprung from religion.
Some people who don't know history assume that these things all involved "foreign" religions in foreign countries.
However, the "witch trials," where thousands of
women were burned alive, happened in the United States among Christian groups
who felt they were simply following the allow no witch to live
mandate in the Bible.
Summary and Conclusions
Exposure to pornography does not directly contribute to rape or sex crime. In fact, there is some evidence that pornography reduces these crimes.
At the same time, pornography threatens decades of religion-based restrictive views on sexual conduct.
For this reason it encounters significant cultural opposition, often backed by laws that have been enacted to support these views.
Although we may hear of studies showing harmful effects of pornography, a close examination of presuppositions and procedures often reveals that the researchers are motivated by personal beliefs and political goals.
We know that the people and situations depicted in most pornography are not typical.
The subjects tend to be more beautiful and handsome than average (not to mention better endowed), the situations staged and the acts shown exceed the boundaries of common sexual predispositions. More troubling, safe sex is seldom shown.
"Sex education" that stops with "just say no," without honestly and openly addressing human sexuality in all its dimensions, invites young people to do their own exploring. Sexual predators have admitted that it's easy to exploit this information vacuum.
Studies also show that "just say no" in the form of abstinence pledges not only doesn't work in most cases but leaves well-intended individuals at a higher risk of pregnancy and sexual disease.
major concern of many social scientists today is that pornographic photos
and videos do not convey realistic human feelings. The focus is on the
mechanics, and the personal and even spiritual dimension of sex is missing.
To Home Page
© 1996 -- 2015, All Rights Reserved