From
1980 to 2005, more than 80% of the total increase in American incomes went to
the richest 1 percent.
|
 |
|
The
C.E.O.’s of the largest American companies earned an average of 42 times as much
as the average worker in 1980, but 531 times as much in 2001.
|
 |
|
Not Since 1920...
...has there been a greater
discrepancy between the "haves" and the "have-nots" in the United States.
Figures released by New York University show that the wealthiest 20% of people in the United States own about 85% of the wealth while the bottom 40% own zero percent
or less of the country's net worth.
The "or less" means that a significant percent of the
US
population has been losing more than it has been gaining.
The primary reason is no mystery. The "haves" control
political decisions and tax laws that favor their increased profits at the
expense of the "have nots" that end up having little political power.
The
richest 1 percent of Americans now take home almost 24 percent of income, up
from about 9 percent in 1976.
|
 |
|
Ironically, in terms of the distribution of wealth the U.S.
is now no different than banana republics. As Timothy Noah of Slate notes the United States now
arguably has a more unequal distribution of wealth than traditional banana
republics such as Nicaragua, Venezuela and Guyana.
To Forum Index
To Home Page
© 2013, All Rights Reserved
|